Things I will never understand:
*Item #1…Why Mayor Mike "BB" Rawlings can initially claim the pension fix brokered by State Rep. Dan Flynn was a taxpayer "bailout" and going to raise taxes, but now, this senate "Conceptual plan," is no longer a "bailout."
Perhaps that's because it never was a taxpayer bailout to begin with. Raising taxes was never, ever in Flynn's plan. Trust me, I read all 188 pages. It just made the city take responsibility for its legal and moral obligations to fund the pension.
At the mayor's press conference, one reporter went astray and asked the mayor about that very point. Why, the reporter asked, isn't this amended plan a taxpayer bailout? Rawlings did what he does best--a bit of a sidewinder shuffle:
"The nature of this bill creates a system where we're not locked in for the set amount for eternity and the last bill did that, and that's why I called it that," Rawlings said.
Hmmmm, interesting how for months Rawlings screamed "taxpayer bailout." He painted a cat a dog, but no one questioned it. Then suddenly, someone pulled the cat's tail, the cat meowed, and now the cat is no longer a dog, but a cat. Go figure.
*Item #2…Why all the stakeholders at Senator West and Senator Huffines marathon meeting apparently agreed not to comment on the details of the "nonbonding conceptual" agreement until the senate amendments to the pension bill were drafted.
And then, the senators immediately held a press conference.
Not to be outdone, Mayor Rawlings squeaked in his press conference waving around the non-binding agreement paper in his hand and talking about how from the beginning he always said "to fix this plan everybody has got to come to the table."
Well, last time I checked, Mr. Mayor, the police never left the table. Nor the firefighters. Nor Chairman Flynn. Nor the pension folks. But where were you? Oh, that's right, you were blowin' and goin' about taxpayer bailouts and pistol whippings.
Interestingly, police and fire groups honored the agreement to remain quiet because, well, a promise is a promise, and first responders take those things rather seriously. That is until the senators and Rawlings blasted the info across the evening news, startling all the active and retired members of the those groups.
This leaves me wondering about what the end game is for that. Is it so that it will be more difficult for police and firefighters to back out or re-negotiate when the actual amendment from the senators proves to be a different thing entirely? You know, when that cat becomes a dog again?
We shall have to wait and see what the senators come up with and how it fits with Rep. Flynn's pension bill. Flynn said he remains "committed to continue to support the 10,000 Police and Fire members and their families first and will not allow them to be bullied by the City."
*Item #3… I will never understand why Mayor Rawlings tries to pretend to care. He's painted first responders as greedy and self-serving among other things. At the press conference, a reporter asked him about the animosity between him and first responders. He did that sidewinder shuffle again, but I found this tidbit rather enlightening:
"We've had a lot of frank conversations. The retirees," Rawlings said about the negotiations. "There were tears in that room. There was emotion going on, and at times there were almost my tears."
Almost.
You know like a cat is almost a dog.
#savethepension #peoplebeforeprojects #RawlingsDoesntCare
Showing posts with label #peoplebeforeprojects. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #peoplebeforeprojects. Show all posts
Sunday, May 14, 2017
Friday, April 21, 2017
SOUND THE ALARM: Is your safety worth $1.50 a month?
Take off the gloves. It’s a no-holds-barred 7-alarm disaster.
The mayor is at it again, trotting out his repertoire of false information and
lies.
It’s a Signal 1-7 all call for the truth, and retired Assistant
Fire Chief Debbie Carlin has answered the alarm to put out the mayor’s lies.
It comes down to this: a mere $18 a year.
That’s $1.50 a month--less than a tall Starbucks latte.
$18 a year. A buck
fifty a month. That’s what it would cost each person if every Dallas resident
chipped in each year to ensure the pension plan is strong enough to keep our
fire and police on the streets.
Aren’t our active and retired first responders worth that
much? Isn’t public safety worth $1.50 a month?
“The Dallas's Mayor either cannot add—or he is a liar,”
Carlin said. “In his letter to the public, the mayor claimed the city would be
out $1.35 billion over the next 30 years to save the police and fire pension. Those
numbers are not accurate.”
Here is the real breakdown of additional costs as stated in
HB 3158:
City of Dallas: $626 million (11% increase)
Active police and fire officers: $1.2 billion (91% increase) plus another $1.4 billion in reduced benefits by age 80 for a total increase of $2.6 billion.
Retired first responders: Reduced cost of living adjustment going forward (and, of course, the Mayor still wants to steal back $700 million in benefits already earned).
Of these three groups--taxpayers, active members and retires--the
City's burden is considerably lower than everyone else’s burden. Plus, the
city's burden is spread over more than 1 million people while the remainder
rests solely on the backs of 10,000 active and retired first responders.
“The Mayor is engaging in ‘fake math,” said Sam Friar of theDallas Police and Fire Pension board. “The Mayor’s words and actions are
consistent with our belief that he is willing — and possibly attempting — to kill
HB 3158 and the current pension plan in order to start a new one.”
Carlin and Friar aren’t the only one to sound the alarm
about the mayor. In a guest commentary in The Dallas Morning News, state representative Jason Villalba notes that HB 3158 is not a taxpayer bailout as
Mayor Rawlings erroneously claims. Rep. Villalba also notes that the entire
Dallas delegation to the Texas legislature supports HB 3158.
Immediately after Rawlings’ letter of lies, Dallas City
Councilman Scott Griggs publically chastised the Mayor.
“I am AGAINST this letter,” Councilman Griggs posted on Facebook. “I
fear that this letter is part of an organized effort to ‘kill the bill.’
Attempting to kill the bill is shameful.”
Shameful indeed.
In an April 21 press release, State Pension Chair Dan Flynn who authored the pension bill said he was “deeply disappointed in the Dallas
Mayor making allegations and spreading incorrect information that won't hold up
under scrutiny.”
According to Flynn, the mayor’s “own staff gave him
incorrect information based upon unsubstantiated assumptions” that “he touted as true.”
Flynn also said the Mayor’s bullying, name calling and
refusal to negotiate in good faith “lends a lot of credence to the opinion of
many that the Mayor just wants to take over the Plan and drastically attack
benefits by collapsing the plan. Well that’s not going to happen.”
“The city can't recruit because they have a preference for
parks over police and firemen, suggesting to everyone those officers rate below
dirt and grass,” Flynn said. “The current legislation raises no taxes and
requires no bonds, and I have no idea why the Mayor thinks it is so.”
“I suggest he stops wasting taxpayer dollars on expensive PR
firms, lobbyists and lawyers, quit claiming bankruptcy is the answer and starts
taking public safety seriously,” Flynn said.
Retired Assistant Fire Chief Carlin confirms that police and
fire officers are leaving in record numbers “because they can make more money
and have a lower work load just about anywhere else. And City Hall is showing
them how much they really don't care.”
It’s time, she said, for taxpayers and city council members
to “stand up and tell the Mayor to sit down and shut up. Tell the Mayor you
think Fire and Police are worth another $18 a year.”
#backthepension #peoplebeforeprojects #morethandirt
#sitdown&shutup
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)